Summer
2002, Issue 215
Careless
Theology Costs Lives!
Malcolm
MacGregor makes an important point in his article, Neither
here, nor there! (Evangelicals Now, January 2002)
when he says that the new birth and conversion, rather than morality, are
man’s primary needs. We are concerned,
however, that Pastor MacGregor finds it necessary to
preface this vital subject with a criticism of the State of Israel.
What could have been an excellent article is replete with historical
inaccuracies and unhelpful interpretations of historical events. MacGregor
begins the piece with the astonishingly inaccurate and misleading observation
that the
land
of
Israel
is “about 60 miles long and 30 miles wide, and is what used to be called the
land
of
Palestine
”. The modern state of
Israel
is more like 260 miles long and 60 miles wide!
To say that
Israel
used to be called “
Palestine
” is also misleading and appears to lend support to the Arab claim that in
1948 the Zionists took the land by force and renamed it. “
Palestine
” was the name given to the land by the Romans after they destroyed
Jerusalem
and the temple in AD 70 in an effort to eradicate all evidence of a Jewish
nation. This they did by renaming
Jerusalem
, “Aelia Capitolina”
and
Judea
, “
Palestine
” after the Jews’ ancient enemies the Philistines. Today’s
“Palestinians” are not at all related to the Philistines. Indeed, the
PLO’s current definition of a Palestinian is non-ethnic; a “Palestinian”,
according to the PLO, is anyone who lived in the land before 1947, and includes
both Arabs and Jews. Between 1948 and 1967, when both the Gaza Strip and the
West Bank
were in Arab hands, no attempt was made to create a Palestinian state!
MacGregor’s claim that a piece of land is
“the root of the trouble which is threatening to destroy our world today” is
wildly inaccurate. The root problem is Islamic imperialism and Islam’s claim
that the Qur’an is the final revelation from God.
That being so, lands that were once under Islamic domination must continue to be
Islamic. So long as
Israel
exists as a sovereign Jewish state, it remains a thorn in the side of Islam,
which is why the PLO refuses to acknowledge the existence of
Israel
on its maps of the region.
Contrary to MacGregor’s claim, the
establishment of the Jewish State in 1948 did not
of itself force thousands of Arabs into exile. Arab citizens were ordered to
leave their homes by the invading armies from Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq,
Yemen and Egypt so that they would be free to slaughter Jews in the reborn
modern State of Israel without fear of accidentally killing fellow Arabs in the
process.
By the same logic that fuels his value judgement on
Israel
’s 1967 pre-emptive attack on
Egypt
’s air force so they could not bomb Israeli towns, MacGregor
would have to condemn
America
’s attack on Al-Qaida bases in
Afghanistan
.
Israel
took
East Jerusalem
and the
West Bank
only after
Jordan
had declared war on her. Both these areas are part of biblical
Judea
promised to the Jewish people both by God and the British!
MacGregor speaks of “various atrocities”
that accompanied “these actions” but mentions only Deir
Yasin, which was not an attack by Israeli
terrorists, but by units of the fledgling Israeli Defence Force in 1948 fighting
a war for survival where, regrettably, civilians were caught up and killed. He
does not, however, make any reference to the numerous atrocities perpetrated by
Muslim civilian mobs as they swept through the Jewish areas of
Jerusalem
killing the inhabitants and burning their homes. It is this inaccurate version
of history that fires the Intifada and Islamic
fundamentalist attacks on
Israel
.
The belief that the Jewish people are at the centre of God’s purpose
for the world is not restricted to American pre-millennial churches.
Erroll Hulse
’s The
Restoration of Israel demonstrates that there are A-millenarians and
Post-millenarians who also believe that
Israel
is central to the divine purposes. Equally, to believe this does not mean one
must view Arabs with enmity. Quite the opposite is true. On the other hand,
however, we have found that many Christians who are “pro-Arab” have little
or no love for Jewish people. (See The
Calvary
Accord, CWI Herald, Winter 2001).
It is significant that when Pastor MacGregor
turns to the text of John 4, he does not deal with the Lord’s words to the
Samaritan woman: “You worship what you do not know; we know what we worship
for salvation is of the Jews” (v22).
Had Pastor MacGregor stuck to his subject,
his article could have been an excellent restatement of the new birth as the
only solution to humanity’s problems. But, as it stands, his treatment of John
4 is more eisegesis (reading a meaning into the
text) than exegesis as he violently and unnaturally shoehorns the problems of
the
Middle East
into John 4. He inexcusably states that Jesus brought a “new religion”,
forgetting Jesus own words in Matthew 5:17: “Do not think that I have come to
abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfil
them.” Faith in Yeshua is the continuation of the oldest faith in the world.
Furthermore, to suggest that world history is “neither here, nor
there”, is a denial of God’s creation and a retreat from God’s calling to
us to go into this “present crumbling world” and make disciples for Jesus
(Matthew 28:19).
By
Richard Gibson and Gil Alon
|